Symposium 2: Chosen Practitioner: Michelangelo

The Time Machine – Symposium 2

Chosen Practitioner: Michelangelo

Deadline: The Time Machine – Symposium 2. Thursday 31st March 2011

•The focus for this Symposium is to take a practitioner in the creative arena, and treat this practitioner in a similar way to the way in which you treated the object/artefact studied for Symposium 1 – as a starting point for broad contextual investigations.

•As with Symposium 1, you will need to examine the resonances, influences and connections in association with this practitioner, both forwards and backwards in time. How was their creative work influenced by others, and by past events? What influence did they have, directly or indirectly? How can they be viewed in the light of historical and contemporary contexts?

•The direction in which the research goes can be both linear and nonlinear. You are encouraged to research at tangents as well as in straight lines! The colourful and interesting byways of Symposium 1 were one of its principal strengths.

•The practitioner can be alive or dead, historical or contemporary.

•You must not use the practioner as the main basis for your Time Machine essay, although you may refer

Auto-S.O.S/recap of the brief:

1) A clear introduction to your presentation, which should also mention the

different published sources you have used and your reasons for choice. You

should use no less than 5 published sources to inform your presentation.

2) A clear definition of key ideas relating to your given topic, with supporting

evidence in the form of, no less than, 3 quotations from 3 different published

sources. Quotations must be interpreted and their importance discussed, they

should also be referenced correctly using the Harvard method.

3) The cultural context (political and social) in which the topic came out of/was in

reaction to.

4) An illustrated ‘who’s who’ of key individuals associated with given topic, with a

clear explanation of what you think their significance is and why.

5) Historical examples of key words/images/artefacts associated with given topic

and an assessment of their importance.

6) Contemporary examples of key words/images/artefacts associated with given

topic and a comparison to the historical examples.

7) A ‘bullet point’ conclusion.

8) A bibliography and illustration list correctly set out using the Harvard method.

9) A PDF version of presentation for uploading to myUCA.